: - , , - - . . – . 3 . , - , - , , . , , - , – , . , 1 . . , 2004. . : 2 3 - : . .: « »; . 32. . .: : / .; . . . , 1974. . 75. , . . . .: . . . , . . , 2004. . 110. . . : . . – , . . . , . - . , . The essence of a dialogic contact based on the Socratic approach is revealed in the article. The dialogue method promotes formation of spiritual and moral values of a senior student’s personality. The author pays attention to the dialogue method as one of public co-reflection and co-participation of participants of a dialogic contact. 281 , , - - , , 3 - . - . , - , , - , – . . , B. C. . , – . , . . , , - .)1 . , , , , . . - , , – », – , , , . . - 2 4 . , . – . , , . , , , , , , ; - , , , - , ; , . . , ( - , , , ; , , - . , . . , . , .), . , , . . , , , - . (« . », « - », « »), 282 , - , , , - c : ( , « - »). . , . . - : . 1. , ? 2. , , , , ? 3. - . ? 4. , . 5. . - - ? 6. 7. ? - , :« », « - », , ? , 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) , , : - , . ; - ; ; ; , , , . . . - . , , , - . - , - , . . , , , , - . - . , , . , - , , . 283 - , , - , - , - , . . , , . , , – . - 1 . . . : , .: , . , 1979. . 256–255; , 1993. . 77; . . . . . - : . 2 . . . . 397. . ., . ., 1994. 3 4 : , 1999. . 21. . . ., . .: , 1979. ., . 397. . . - . 93. . . . – , . . , . - . . The article reveals the concept of intercultural communication as one of the tasks of contemporary university education. In this respect the author asserts the necessity of inclusion of Russian university teachers into intercultural communication. The author considers corporate foreign language teaching within the framework of professional communication as a means of preparing university teachers to intercultural communication. , - , , , . , , . , , 284 -